what if native systemd service is slower than old sysvinit script?

Steve Clark sclark at netwolves.com
Sat Sep 17 01:03:41 UTC 2011

On 09/16/2011 08:08 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Fri, 2011-09-16 at 08:48 -0400, Genes MailLists wrote:
>> On 09/16/2011 05:01 AM, Olav Vitters wrote:
>>> On Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 05:17:43PM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
>>>> True. As far as GNOME goes, though, whenever you suggest 'bulletproof
>>>> session management', they say 'that's what suspend is for'...
>>> I'd like to see proper session management. However, the existing
>>> X protocol is terrible (a KDE'er talked about the horrors @ Desktop
>>> Summit), and session management itself is really difficult.
>>    Temptinh as it might be, just please keep session management away from
>> the init daemon and let it do its one important job properly, robustly
>> and well and not suffer the path to sure death of trying to be all
>> things  - just coz it can coz its PID 1,2, 3 etc.
> We aren't really talking about systemd any more, in this branch of the
> thread.
Were not? From:

systemd System and Session Manager

Stephen Clark
Sr. Software Engineer III
Phone: 813-579-3200
Fax: 813-882-0209
Email: steve.clark at netwolves.com
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/attachments/20110916/062fadfe/attachment.html 

More information about the devel mailing list