Responsibility for rebuilding dependent components, was: F-16 Branched report: 20110920 changes
mjg59 at srcf.ucam.org
Tue Sep 20 14:37:04 UTC 2011
On Tue, Sep 20, 2011 at 04:35:16PM +0200, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
> That said, a reasonable QA would cherry-pick such "solution
> candidates" from *-testing and integrate them. Simply flooding
> maintainers "with complaint mails" about broken deps, maintainers
> believe to already have fixed doesn't help anybody. Neither the
> testers (who can't test because of these broken deps), nor the
> maintainers (who believe to have done everything possible), nor the
> users (who will end up with low-quality distros).
What the maintainers could have done is not upload a package that breaks
binary compatibility into a distribution that's attempting to stabalise
for release. Really. Don't do that.
Matthew Garrett | mjg59 at srcf.ucam.org
More information about the devel