Responsibility for rebuilding dependent components, was: F-16 Branched report: 20110920 changes
nils at redhat.com
Tue Sep 20 15:52:57 UTC 2011
On Tue, 2011-09-20 at 15:19 +0200, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
> On 09/20/2011 03:01 PM, Nils Philippsen wrote:
> > On Tue, 2011-09-20 at 13:53 +0200, Johannes Lips wrote:
> >> What's wrong with all that broken deps? Is this just a missing rebuild
> >> against opencv and other libs or what's the reason for all this
> >> "mess". I mean the release of F16 is not that far away and the amount
> >> of broken deps is quite big imho.
> >> I would be glad helping out if this is due to some orphaned packages.
> > Some of these seem to be a case of "new library version was built and
> > pushed as an update without the rebuilds of dependent components". It
> > seems to be unclear who is responsible for the dependents to be rebuilt
> > and included in the same update as the library being updated.
> When you have a closer look, you'll notice that such "mass rebuilts"
> were being delayed by QA's "delay queue" and now are stuck.
I didn't want to (re)start that particular discussion ;-).
We need some guidelines who should drive rebuilds in such a situation,
regardless of whether it happens in Rawhide or Branched or wherever.
Otherwise we'll end up with nobody doing the driving.
Nils Philippsen "Those who would give up Essential Liberty to purchase
Red Hat a little Temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty
nils at redhat.com nor Safety." -- Benjamin Franklin, 1759
PGP fingerprint: C4A8 9474 5C4C ADE3 2B8F 656D 47D8 9B65 6951 3011
More information about the devel