grub / grub2 conflicts
pjones at redhat.com
Thu Sep 22 20:44:40 UTC 2011
On 09/22/2011 02:47 PM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> There is a further issue #2, quite orthogonal, which is that grub
> (upstream) doesn't support offline installation. This is a bug in
> grub 1& 2 which really should be taken upstream.
You're still missing the point here. This wasn't a design feature of grub
or of grub2. It's not a bug, it's a thing nobody has ever planned for.
Additionally, there is no grub 1 upstream. You're never going to convince
any "upstream" to change this, because there's nobody working on it. There
hasn't been an upstream since 2005. It needs to be jettisoned into space.
> Nevertheless, it's quite possible to use grub1 offline on compatible
> guests. We don't really need to "prove" this, because we do it, and
> test the results, and we publish everything we do in open source code.
And that's not going to be possible when we don't install grub1 on the host
More information about the devel