PostgreSQL 9.1 and Lucene Core for F16
mkkp4x4 at gmail.com
Sun Sep 25 10:16:26 UTC 2011
W dniu 11 września 2011 22:47 użytkownik Michał Piotrowski
<mkkp4x4 at gmail.com> napisał:
> 2011/9/11 Tom Lane <tgl at redhat.com>:
>> =?ISO-8859-2?Q?Micha=B3_Piotrowski?= <mkkp4x4 at gmail.com> writes:
>>> 2011/9/11 Tom Lane <tgl at redhat.com>:
>>>> Yeah. I have done test packaging of 9.1rc1 already, so it's pretty much
>>>> ready to go on my end. I would be prepared to push 9.1 into f16 on
>>>> Monday if there were enough people willing to test and up-karma it
>>>> before the freeze ... any volunteers out there?
>>> I don't have F16, but I can rebuild packages and test on F15 if this
>>> will have some test value.
>> F15 is where I've been doing my own testing. It's the F16 packages that
>> would need karma, though.
> I tried to upgrade to F16 at Wednesday, but preupgrade failed
> somewhere. Next week I will not be able to upgrade because my vacation
> ended and I need a fully functioning system over the next few days
> (I've got a large webapp deployment). So I am afraid that I will not
> be useful for testing PGSQL 9.1 on F16.
>> The database weenie in me says that trying to push 9.1.0 into F16 at
>> this late date is insane. I'm willing to do it if we can get enough
>> testing attention, but I think it has to be honest testing in an
>> F16-alpha environment.
> If I find some time I'll try to install F16 on VM, but I do not know
> whether such tests will be useful. It seems to me that best and most
> valuable tests would be just do some regular work on DB.
I'm using PostgreSQL 9.1 on F16 for a week and did not notice any
problems (except slower start). I used preupgrade to update system -
after changing database directory in service file I had a working
database. From my POV this update was painless :)
Great job. Thanks!
More information about the devel