unison formal review

Richard W.M. Jones rjones at redhat.com
Tue Sep 27 17:46:08 UTC 2011


On Tue, Sep 27, 2011 at 05:13:46PM +0200, Gregor Tätzner wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> Anyone want to review this one: 
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=734531
> 
> I'm sure a lot of Fedora users are awaiting this update.

Questions ...

Are we going to obsolete these packages:

https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/name/unison213
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/name/unison227
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/name/unison

Instead of introducing yet another variation, can we somehow create a
single 'unison' package which covers all of the protocol variants?

Adding a new package every time upstream has a slight wobble over the
Unison protocol just seems wrong to me, and I'm sure there's got to be
a better way to package this.

Did you look at what Debian are doing?

Rich.

-- 
Richard Jones, Virtualization Group, Red Hat http://people.redhat.com/~rjones
libguestfs lets you edit virtual machines.  Supports shell scripting,
bindings from many languages.  http://libguestfs.org


More information about the devel mailing list