unison formal review

Garrett Holmstrom gholms at fedoraproject.org
Thu Sep 29 05:13:50 UTC 2011


On 2011-09-28 14:15, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> On Wed, 28 Sep 2011 22:00:40 +0100
> "Richard W.M. Jones"<rjones at redhat.com>  wrote:
>> I was thinking of something slightly simpler: a single 'unison'
>> package that contained several binaries, like /usr/bin/unison227,
>> /usr/bin/unison (symlink to latest).
>
> That does help with needing re-reviews and names and such, but it
> doesn't help in that you have to update everything everytime a new
> version comes out.

One build could produce a package for each version.  The packages' 
n-v-rs could then be maintained independently.  I am not sure how bodhi 
would behave in such a case, though.

This most certainly is not optimal; I'm simply throwing the idea over 
the wall.


More information about the devel mailing list