unison formal review

[Till Maas]

On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 06:50:04PM +0200, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrote:

> Example: we have unison-2.9-1 package which produces
> unison-2.9-1
> unison28-2.8-2
> unison21-2.1-5
> 
> We want to update unison28, so the next build of unison-2.9-2 produces only:
> unison28-2.8.1-1
> 
> What do you think?

This is too complex and makes automatic mass rebuilds more complicated.

Kind regards
Till