Feedback on secondary architecture promotion requirements draft

[Peter Robinson]

On Tue, Apr 3, 2012 at 10:34 PM, Josh Boyer <jwboyer at gmail.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 3, 2012 at 5:29 PM, DJ Delorie <dj at redhat.com> wrote:
>>
>>> The rules are, it has to be rack mountable hardware
>>
>> Hmmm... how many Raspberry Pis can we fit in a rack?
>>
>> And at $35 each, spares would be cheaper than a warranty ;-)
>
> I don't think those were ever targetted as the ARM builder hardware
> that would go in PHX2.  Jon mentioned "enterprise class" ARM servers
> numerous times.  I was assuming that meant rack mountable.

It's not, it was a joke (at least I think it was), they don't even
support ARMv7 and aren't currently completely open so aren't an option
and have never been discussed.

Peter