Feedback on secondary architecture promotion requirements draft

[Jesse Keating]

On 4/4/12 11:36 AM, DJ Delorie wrote:
>> To be clear, it would be used but ownership still resides with whomever
>> >  purchased the hardware.
> Really?  You can't donate hardware, you can only let Fedora borrow it?
> If you sponsor catering at a con, do you need to get the food back at
> some point too?  Sounds like a silly distinction.

Hardware is likely classified in tax code as an asset, where as food at 
a conference is not.  Assets being bought by somebody else and "donated" 
to a commercial entity probably looks fishy.

It's tax law, it's not going to be logical.

-- 
Help me fight child abuse: http://tinyurl.com/jlkcourage

- jlk