rawhide vs. protected multilib versions

[Jim Meyering]

James Antill wrote:
> On Thu, 2012-04-05 at 14:40 +0200, Jim Meyering wrote:
>> I installed x86_64 F17 from the netinst.iso yesterday, selected
>> a minimal install, and immediately upgraded to rawhide.
>> Worked like a charm.
> [...]
>>     Packages skipped because of dependency problems:
>>         gcc-c++-4.7.0-0.20.fc17.x86_64 from rawhide
>>         glibc-2.15-32.fc18.i686 from rawhide
>>         libgcc-4.7.0-0.20.fc17.i686 from rawhide
>>         libstdc++-4.7.0-0.20.fc17.i686 from rawhide
>>         libstdc++-devel-4.7.0-0.20.fc17.x86_64 from rawhide
>>         nss-softokn-freebl-3.13.4-0.1.fc18.beta1.1.i686 from rawhide
>>
>> Any suggestions?
>
>  You can probably work around the repo. problems by using something
> like:
>
> yum shell
> downgrade libstdc++
> install gcc-c++
> run

Perfect!
That did just what I wanted.  Thank you!