rawhide vs. protected multilib versions

[Kevin Kofler]

Kalev Lember wrote:
> It's very understandable why rpm allows this. But yum's depsolver on the
> other hand should be tailored to the way Fedora repos are set up and, in
> my opinion, not install compat arch packages when it can solve the deps
> with the primary arch packages.

The point is that it can't here.

You'd just get a different error message if it didn't try using the multilib 
version that way.

Rawhide will always have broken dependencies. Releases and branched 
prerelease trees may soon get their dependencies enforced by Bodhi through 
AutoQA, but due to how Rawhide works, that's not possible in Rawhide.

        Kevin Kofler