F17 Beta to slip by an additional week.

Mon Apr 9 15:46:45 UTC 2012

Hi,

2012/4/5 Robyn Bergeron <rbergero at redhat.com>:
> At the Go/No-Go meeting it was decided to slip the Beta by an additional
> week[1]. Minutes follow below.
>
> Though the QA team was able to get through all validation testing, it was
> found that preupgrade was not functioning at an acceptable level, thus
> becoming an additional blocker which prevents us from shipping RC3, and
> necessitating the creation of an RC4.
>
> As a result, ALL MAJOR MILESTONES, and their dependent tasks, will be pushed
> out by one week. Beta will now be looking at an expected release of
> 2012-04-17, and F17 GA is now scheduled for 2012-05-22. This is the second
> one-week slip of beta.
>
> Adjustments to the full F17 schedule have been completed and now reflect the
> above Beta and GA dates, and high-level milestones have been updated as well
> on the Schedule wiki page[3].
>
> We will be meeting again next Wednesday  for another Go/No-Go meeting
> (2012-04-11.)  All hail our QA pals and the anacondanistas for their
> dedication (and many, many others as well).
>
> -Robyn
>
> [1] Minutes:
> http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting-1/2012-04-05/gono-go_continuation_f17_beta_rc3_part_two_or_three.2012-04-05-15.00.html
>
>    Logs:
> http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting-1/2012-04-05/gono-go_continuation_f17_beta_rc3_part_two_or_three.2012-04-05-15.00.log.html
>
> [2] http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Current_Release_Blockers
>
> [3] http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Schedule
>
>
> Minutes:
>
> =============================================================
> #fedora-meeting-1: Go/No Go Continuation, Round Two, RC3, F17
> =============================================================
>
>
> Meeting started by rbergeron at 15:00:38 UTC. The full logs are
> available at
> http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting-1/2012-04-05/gono-go_continuation_f17_beta_rc3_part_two_or_three.2012-04-05-15.00.log.html
> .
>
>
>
> Meeting summary
> ---------------
> * Who's up  (rbergeron, 15:01:03)
>
> * Test Results  (rbergeron, 15:11:31)
>  * LINK:
>    https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Fedora_17_Beta_RC3_Install
>    (rbergeron, 15:11:37)
>  * LINK:
>    https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Fedora_17_Beta_RC3_Base
>    (rbergeron, 15:12:11)
>  * LINK:
>    https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Fedora_17_Beta_RC3_Desktop
>    (rbergeron, 15:12:22)
>  * AGREED: we are okay with the level of test coverage as of now on RC3
>    (rbergeron, 15:16:31)
>
> * Blockers  (rbergeron, 15:16:41)

If I remember correctly, those were some problems with preupgrade due to the
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/UsrMove
feature.

Is it possible to upgrade now from F16 to F17 with preupgrade?

>
> * https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=741594  (adamw, 15:18:19)
>  * LINK: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=741594#c14
>    (Martix, 15:18:54)
>  * AGREED: 741594 does not hit any of the criteria and the cited
>    scenarios are not significant enough to worry about delaying the
>    beta  (adamw, 15:29:18)
>
> * https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=810226  (adamw, 15:31:12)
>  * LINK: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/9198/   (adamw,
>    15:40:55)
>
> * https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=810161  (adamw, 15:48:57)
>  * AGREED: 810161 is rejected as a blocker because the impact is minor
>    (it's essentially a cosmetic bug, desktop is still usable), also it
>    only hits one specific virt configuration so it can at least be
>    worked around. accepted as NTH and will be commonbugs'ed if we ship
>    with it  (adamw, 16:13:56)
>
> * https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=810289  (adamw, 16:14:24)
>  * AGREED: #810289 is rejected as a blocker on the basis that we've
>    never actually checked for low space on upgrade (and hence have
>    implictly never considered it a blocking issue). anaconda will just
>    try to upgrade and explode. so this isn't in fact a regression
>    compared to earlier releases, and we don't have a specific
>    requirement for a low space check in criteria or anywhere else.
>    accepted as NTH  (adamw, 16:31:38)
>
> * https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=810136  (adamw, 16:31:59)
>  * AGREED: 810136 turns out to be a dupe of 810005, moving discussion
>    (adamw, 19:45:37)
>
> * https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=810005  (adamw, 19:45:42)
>  * AGREED: 810005 is accepted as a blocker per criterion "The installer
>    must be able to successfully complete an upgrade installation from a
>    clean, fully updated default installation (from any official install
>    medium) of the previous stable Fedora release, either via preupgrade
>    or by booting to the installer manually. The upgraded system must
>    meet all release criteria". the known workaround has too many
>    limitations to be considered 'good enough'  (adamw, 19:53:23)
>
> * Go or no-go?  (rbergeron, 19:54:12)
>  * we have a blocker.  (rbergeron, 19:54:27)
>  * qa votes no-go, as do various others from engineering, fesco, pm
>    (rbergeron, 19:55:18)
>  * AGREED: we are no-go on F17 Beta RC3 sadly  (adamw, 19:58:27)
>  * ACTION: rbergeron to update schedule.... again  (rbergeron,
>    19:58:55)
>  * ACTION: rbergero to send slip mail  (rbergeron, 20:00:19)
>  * ACTION: tflink to do blocker meeting mail following slip notice
>    (rbergeron, 20:00:38)
>  * ACTION: qa heroes of awesome to get some rest plz  (rbergeron,
>    20:03:09)
>  * ACTION: adamw to get a hole in one  (rbergeron, 20:03:23)
>  * we will re-convene tomorrow or monday  (adamw, 20:08:56)
>
> Meeting ended at 20:08:59 UTC.
>
>
>
>
> Action Items
> ------------
> * rbergeron to update schedule.... again
> * rbergero to send slip mail
> * tflink to do blocker meeting mail following slip notice
> * qa heroes of awesome to get some rest plz
> * adamw to get a hole in one
>
>
>
>
> Action Items, by person
> -----------------------
> * adamw
>  * adamw to get a hole in one
> * rbergeron
>  * rbergeron to update schedule.... again
> * tflink
>  * tflink to do blocker meeting mail following slip notice
> * **UNASSIGNED**
>  * rbergero to send slip mail
>  * qa heroes of awesome to get some rest plz
>
>
>
>
> People Present (lines said)
> ---------------------------
> * adamw (360)
> EDITOR'S NOTE: Dude! It's like 360 degrees of adamw :)
> * wwoods (99)
> * rbergeron (91)
> * tflink (56)
> * bcl (54)
> * nirik (49)
> * Kevin_Kofler (37)
> * ajax (32)
> * Martix (19)
> * rdieter_work (8)
> * zodbot (6)
> * cpuobsessed (5)
> * pjones (5)
> * ianweller (4)
> * kalev (3)
> * spot (3)
> * satellit_laptop (1)
> * pschindl_ (1)
>
>
>
>
> Generated by `MeetBot`_ 0.1.4
>
> .. _`MeetBot`: http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> devel-announce mailing list
> devel-announce at lists.fedoraproject.org
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel-announce
> --
> devel mailing list
> devel at lists.fedoraproject.org
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

-- 
Best regards,
Michal

http://eventhorizon.pl/