Why fixes of broken dependencies are not automatically tagged into F17

[Vít Ondruch]

Dne 6.4.2012 18:57, Jared K. Smith napsal(a):
> On Fri, Apr 6, 2012 at 8:11 AM, Vít Ondruch<vondruch at redhat.com>  wrote:
>> I am wondering why fixes of broken dependencies are not automatically tagged
>> into F17 (of course after staging in Bodhi), when the situation couldn't be
>> worse by such fix. If F17 is supposed to stabilize during freeze, such fix
>> is definitely stabilizing IMO. Am I missing something?
> If it's stabilizing, then propose it as a NTH fix, and the QA team
> will help vote it up or down in the blocker review meetings.
> http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:SOP_nth_bug_process
>
> --
> Jared Smith

Actually the reason why I am asking is that there is a lot of broken 
dependencies, because of Ruby update. Some of them are already fixed, 
but not accepted due to freeze. Proposing all this fixes as NTH would be 
nightmare for me as well as for the blocker review meeting. I'd love to 
see this process simplified/automated.

Vit