F17 btrfsck crash

Josef Bacik josef at toxicpanda.com
Fri Apr 13 19:28:16 UTC 2012


Sorry I need to include a patch I sent recently to the list.  Those
errors are bogus, btrfsck just needs to be taught about our special
space cache inodes.  I'll pull that into fedora.  You are right, you
don't need to run btrfsck on boot, just if you run into issues.
Thanks,

Josef

On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 6:13 PM, Chris Murphy <lists at colorremedies.com> wrote:
>
>
> On Apr 11, 2012, at 12:00 PM, Josef Bacik wrote:
>
>> Got it all updated, it's in koji, 0.19-18 is what you want.  Thanks,
>
> Thanks Josef. This is now available with a yum update and has fixed the problem. However, this is what I get as a result.
>
> I'm under the impression that a btrfsck isn't needed if there are no mount errors. Yet in this case there are no mount errors in dmesg, yet btrfsck says there are errors. Expected, or not? And is this better taken to the btrfs list?
>
>
> [root at f17v chris]# btrfsck /dev/sdb4
> checking extents
> checking fs roots
> root 5 inode 18446744073709551604 errors 2000
> root 5 inode 18446744073709551605 errors 1
> found 6472544256 bytes used err is 1
> total csum bytes: 5872152
> total tree bytes: 459329536
> total fs tree bytes: 426516480
> btree space waste bytes: 134110780
> file data blocks allocated: 15564447744
>  referenced 6255255552
> Btrfs Btrfs v0.19
>
>
> Chris Murphy
> --
> devel mailing list
> devel at lists.fedoraproject.org
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel


More information about the devel mailing list