Feedback on secondary architecute promotion requirements draft

[Jon Masters]

On 04/19/2012 05:36 PM, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> Ok, I'll modify that section. Thanks for the feedback!

Matthew,

Could you add comments addressing the need for documentation and website
content around a promoted arch? And any of the other comments I made in
my previous reply that you would like to add in? E.g. clarifying what
"sufficient developer resources" means, etc.

Thanks,

Jon.