Feedback on secondary architecute promotion requirements draft
jcm at redhat.com
Fri Apr 20 20:22:38 UTC 2012
On 04/19/2012 05:36 PM, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> Ok, I'll modify that section. Thanks for the feedback!
Could you add comments addressing the need for documentation and website
content around a promoted arch? And any of the other comments I made in
my previous reply that you would like to add in? E.g. clarifying what
"sufficient developer resources" means, etc.
More information about the devel