Feedback on secondary architecute promotion requirements draft

[Jon Masters]

On 04/20/2012 04:30 PM, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 20, 2012 at 04:22:38PM -0400, Jon Masters wrote:
>> On 04/19/2012 05:36 PM, Matthew Garrett wrote:
>>> Ok, I'll modify that section. Thanks for the feedback!
>>
>> Matthew,
>>
>> Could you add comments addressing the need for documentation and website
>> content around a promoted arch? And any of the other comments I made in
>> my previous reply that you would like to add in? E.g. clarifying what
>> "sufficient developer resources" means, etc.
> 
> I think we'll want to discuss the documentation and website scenario 
> first - I have no idea how well PPC was documented when it was a primary 
> architecture, and we don't necessarily want to hold new ones to a higher 
> standard when it comes to that. But yes, I'll tidy up the rest before 
> the fesco meeting.

Excellent. Thanks. See you in #fedora-meeting ;)

Jon.