RFC: Primary architecture promotion requirements

[Matthew Garrett]

On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 07:54:57PM +0000, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" wrote:
> On 04/23/2012 07:42 PM, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> >Because if you have hardware that can install via Anaconda and you don't
> >support installing via Anaconda, you're not Fedora.
> So FESCo is in otherwords saying that other installers and even
> installing methods ( think like the distribution would be flashed to
> a device in the maybe not to distant future instead of being
> installed in the traditional sense as we know it to be ) are not
> allowed or otherwise considered to be part of the distribution
> should some community members want to writer and or package an
> alternative installer to ship and use on their spin?

Fesco is saying that if you have hardware that can install via Anaconda, 
you must support installing via Anaconda. It's legitimate for you to 
also have other install mechanisms, and hardware that's incapable of 
supporting Anaconda installs isn't required to have them.

-- 
Matthew Garrett | mjg59 at srcf.ucam.org