RFC: Primary architecture promotion requirements

[Jon Ciesla]

On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 3:13 PM, Jared K. Smith
<jsmith at fedoraproject.org> wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 3:42 PM, Matthew Garrett <mjg59 at srcf.ucam.org> wrote:
>> Because if you have hardware that can install via Anaconda and you don't
>> support installing via Anaconda, you're not Fedora.
>
> Just for the sake of argument, our Amazon EC2 images aren't using
> Anaconda for installation, but they're still considered part of
> Fedora.

I think that's more akin to a spin.

> I agree with the sentiment that Anaconda should be a requirement for
> instances where it makes sense to boot from bootable media
> (DVD/CD/USB) and install via Anaconda, but in the case of ARM, the
> traditional installation method is often "copy an image to an SD (or
> micro-SD) card and then boot from that card.  Just to make sure I'm
> clear, are you insisting that the software tool that puts the image on
> the SD card be Anaconda, or are you OK with some other Fedora-approved
> tool for doing so?
>
> --
> Jared Smith
> --
> devel mailing list
> devel at lists.fedoraproject.org
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel



-- 
http://cecinestpasunefromage.wordpress.com/
------------------------------------------------
in your fear, seek only peace
in your fear, seek only love

-d. bowie