F17 TC1 DVD still no btrfs as install option?

[Seth Vidal]

On Wed, 25 Apr 2012, Josef Bacik wrote:

> On Wed, Apr 25, 2012 at 1:22 PM, Chris <xchris89x at googlemail.com> wrote:
>> 2012/4/25 Josef Bacik <josef at toxicpanda.com>:
>>> On Wed, Apr 25, 2012 at 12:25 PM, Colin Walters <walters at verbum.org> wrote:
>>>> On Wed, 2012-04-25 at 12:03 -0400, Josef Bacik wrote:
>>>>> On Wed, Apr 25, 2012 at 11:07 AM, Tomasz Torcz <tomek at pipebreaker.pl> wrote:
>>>>>> On Wed, Apr 25, 2012 at 01:34:07PM +0200, Matthias Runge wrote:
>>>>>>> On 25/04/12 09:48, Vít Ondruch wrote:
>>>>>>>> +1. I'd like to see this fixed before final.
>>>>>>> Yes, me too. Afaik, SuSE supports btrfs even for their enterprise distro.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>  For added laughs, SLES does not support read-write ext4. Ext4 read-only support
>>>>>> is provided for migrating to btrfs.
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> That's because Btrfs is way more stable than ext4,
>>>>
>>>> [citation needed]
>>>>
>>>
>>> https://twitter.com/#!/josefbacik/status/195190540529184768
>>
>> Is this a joke? Btrfs more stable than ext4??? Not really???
>>
>
> According to the stab-o-matic stability testing framework[1] btrfs
> scores a 63 whereas ext4 scores a 37, so yes, I'm completely serious,
>
> Josef
>
> [1] credit goes to Sandeen for that one.

Josef,
  I'm a little confused here too. Can you explain to me the testing 
infrastructure involved with stab-o-matic?

thanks,
-sv