F17 TC1 DVD still no btrfs as install option?

[Josef Bacik]

On Wed, Apr 25, 2012 at 1:35 PM, Reindl Harald <h.reindl at thelounge.net> wrote:
>
>
> Am 25.04.2012 18:03, schrieb Josef Bacik:
>> On Wed, Apr 25, 2012 at 11:07 AM, Tomasz Torcz <tomek at pipebreaker.pl> wrote:
>>> On Wed, Apr 25, 2012 at 01:34:07PM +0200, Matthias Runge wrote:
>>>> On 25/04/12 09:48, Vít Ondruch wrote:
>>>>> +1. I'd like to see this fixed before final.
>>>> Yes, me too. Afaik, SuSE supports btrfs even for their enterprise distro.
>>>
>>>  For added laughs, SLES does not support read-write ext4. Ext4 read-only support
>>> is provided for migrating to btrfs.
>>>
>>
>> That's because Btrfs is way more stable than ext4,
>
> oh no, please do not make such jokes
>
> as long there exists even no fsck and as long there are
> zero production worksloads generic tests are useless
>
> and what about workloads like virtual machines where AFAIK
> BTRFS is still completly unuseable
>
> BTRFS has many nice things and will be in the future a good
> FS but call it "more stable than ext4" while ext4 is since
> years useable for production is a past-1st-april joke
>

Wow ok I would have thought after the stab-o-matic thing it would have
been obvious I was kidding, Btrfs still has a little ways to go before
it is as stable as Ext4, though we are getting closer.  Thanks,

Josef