redhat-lsb-desktop versus transition to current libpng

Rahul Sundaram metherid at gmail.com
Wed Aug 1 09:47:58 UTC 2012


On 08/01/2012 01:06 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:

> Well, that's really it. The format of LSB is a bit odd to a lay reader,
> but AFAICT, it really does mean: to be technically in compliance with
> LSB-desktop, you need to ship a libpng12.so.0 which provides the listed
> functions. End of story. I don't see a workaround.

Fedora is not LSB compatible.  Is it?  Why do we even care about this at
all?

Rahul



More information about the devel mailing list