redhat-lsb-desktop versus transition to current libpng
Rahul Sundaram
metherid at gmail.com
Wed Aug 1 09:47:58 UTC 2012
On 08/01/2012 01:06 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> Well, that's really it. The format of LSB is a bit odd to a lay reader,
> but AFAICT, it really does mean: to be technically in compliance with
> LSB-desktop, you need to ship a libpng12.so.0 which provides the listed
> functions. End of story. I don't see a workaround.
Fedora is not LSB compatible. Is it? Why do we even care about this at
all?
Rahul
More information about the devel
mailing list