rawhide buildroot broken: octave packages?

[Ankur Sinha]

On Mon, 2012-12-03 at 21:52 -0600, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 04, 2012 at 13:08:13 +1100,
>    Ankur Sinha <sanjay.ankur at gmail.com> wrote:
> >Hi folks,
> >
> >I recently packaged octave-odepkg[1] reviewed and approved for fedora.
> >I've been able to build it for both f18 and f17, but the rawhide builds
> >keep failing because of what looks like a broken dep chain:
> 
> Probably you want to try rebuilding octave first.
> 
> >
> >INFO: Results and/or logs in: /var/lib/mock/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/result
> >ERROR: Command failed:
> > # ['/usr/bin/yum-builddep', '--installroot',
> >'/var/lib/mock/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/root/',
> >'/var/lib/mock/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/root///builddir/build/SRPMS/octave-odepkg-0.8.2-2.fc19.src.rpm']
> >Getting requirements for octave-odepkg-0.8.2-2.fc19.src
> > --> 6:octave-devel-3.6.3-2.fc19.x86_64
> >Error: Package: 6:octave-3.6.3-2.fc19.x86_64 (fedora)
> >           Requires: libcxsparse.so.2()(64bit)
> >Error: Package: 6:octave-3.6.3-2.fc19.x86_64 (fedora)
> >           Requires: libcholmod.so.1()(64bit)
> > You could try using --skip-broken to work around the problem
> > You could try running: rpm -Va --nofiles --nodigest
> >
> >How should I proceed? File a bug against octave for broken deps?
> 
> Yes. There is a chance that a simple rebuild will be good enough.

Ah. I'm not the maintainer. I'll go file a bug.

-- 
Thanks, 
Warm regards,
Ankur: "FranciscoD"

Please only print if necessary. 

Looking to contribute to Fedora? Look here: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_Join_SIG

http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Ankursinha
http://dodoincfedora.wordpress.com/
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 490 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/attachments/20121204/1dc7f58e/attachment-0001.sig>