Summary/Minutes for Wednesday's FESCo meeting (2012-12-05)

[Matthew Miller]

On Thu, Dec 06, 2012 at 11:20:22AM -0500, Josh Boyer wrote:
> As I said in the meeting yesterday, I think the definition of a Feature
> needs to be cleared up before we can really tackle this one.  Feature to
> me is something important enough that it shouldn't be auto-accepted.  If
> there is some other class of thing people submit that isn't a Feature,
> then I might be for auto-accepting of those.

Alternately, "Feature" could be the term for the any small or big thing
which is useful to track and tout for marketing purposes, and big technical
changes could be, I dunno... "Major Changes".

Or "Alterations" or "Evolutions" or "Disruptions" (well, that's a little
negative so not that). For example adding systemd is a feature, while making
it the default is a big change. Same with firewalld. UsrMove wasn't really a
feature *at all*, but definitely a big change.


-- 
Matthew Miller  ☁☁☁  Fedora Cloud Architect  ☁☁☁  <mattdm at fedoraproject.org>