fedup: does not verify source

Marcela Mašláňová mmaslano at redhat.com
Mon Dec 17 13:23:04 UTC 2012


On 12/17/2012 03:15 AM, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
>
>
>
> On Sun, Dec 16, 2012 at 8:01 PM, Björn Persson
> <bjorn at xn--rombobjrn-67a.se <mailto:bjorn at xn--rombobjrn-67a.se>> wrote:
>
>     Except for Yum, which has for years been the only method that was both
>     secure and practical anyway, but I agree. As long as people are being
>     discouraged from upgrading by Yum because it's "unsupported", removing
>     the only "supported" and secure upgrade method is definitely a
>     regression, and quite irresponsible.
>
>
> I have filed a ticket for FESCo's consideration on the fedup situation
>
> https://fedorahosted.org/fesco/ticket/982
>
> No ISO based or graphical upgrade by itself is a severe regression but
> having no supported upgrade path that is secure is I think is just
> unacceptable.
>
> Rahul
>
>
I don't think FESCo should interfere according to the process:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:SOP_blocker_bug_process

Imho you can join their next go/no-go meeting and try to persuade all 
stakeholders.

Marcela


More information about the devel mailing list