Summary/Minutes for today's FESCo meeting (2012-12-19)

Don Dutile ddutile at redhat.com
Fri Dec 21 15:49:19 UTC 2012


On 12/20/2012 11:54 PM, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 21, 2012 at 05:38:17AM +0100, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
>
>> I disagree. systemd simply hasn't taken libexecdir into account in
>> its design and now is trying to propagate their oversight/mistake as
>> "standard" instead of making their works compliant with _our_
>> distro's demands.
>
> libexec doesn't exist in any published version of the FHS, and even the
> draft of 3.0 makes it clear that it's optional. Our use of libexec is
> non-standard, not systemd's use of lib.
>

fyi: libexec has been critical to virtualization for quite some time...



More information about the devel mailing list