Summary/Minutes for today's FESCo meeting (2012-12-19)

[Matthew Garrett]

On Fri, Dec 21, 2012 at 12:42:14AM -0800, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:

> However, you also miss my point.  Adam's message was saying that the
> guidelines forced people to use libexecdir and then went on to point out the
> drawbacks of forcing specifically libexecdir on upstreams that didn't have that
> coded in.  So, as I said, in that context it's meaningless to bring up
> arguments that are only addressed to libexecdir because %{_libdir} is an
> alternative.

I think you miss my point. Where consistency across architectures is 
desired, %{_libdir} isn't an option, so in the absence of an exception 
the guidelines force people to use libexec.

-- 
Matthew Garrett | mjg59 at srcf.ucam.org