filesystem

[Michel Alexandre Salim]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On 02/04/2012 11:43 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> On Fri, 3 Feb 2012 17:47:10 -0800 darrell pfeifer
> <darrellpf at gmail.com> wrote:
> 
>> On Fri, Feb 3, 2012 at 17:15, Adam Williamson
>> <awilliam at redhat.com> wrote:
>> 
>>> On Fri, 2012-02-03 at 16:27 -0800, darrell pfeifer wrote:
>>>> As far as I've seen on the list, the /usr move stuff was
>>>> supposed to be confined by tagging to f17-usermove so it
>>>> wouldn't affect rawhide until the big switch was pulled.
>>> 
>>> Yes. We just pulled the big switch. :)
>>> 
>>> 
>> The heads-up announcement that Harald did just over a week ago
>> was a very good thing.
>> 
>> From the smileys it seems there is a recognition that the change
>> is a big deal.
>> 
>> It would be nice if
> 
> let me preface by saying: "I agree with the points below" :)
> 
>> a) the date of the actual switch pulling had been announced in 
>> advance.
> 
> The hold up has been getting the rpm changes to the rhel6 rpm
> tested sufficiently for rel-eng to be comfortable with deploying it
> on builders/compose host. That happened friday. At that point the
> change could be announced, but with branching happening tuesday,
> that would result in almost no time before branching to try and fix
> things.
> 
>> b) the (now modified) instructions in basic form were re-iterated
>> on the list.
> 
> This has happened now. see: 
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Upgrading_Fedora_using_yum#Fedora_16_-.3E_Fedora_17
>
> 
For those of us early testers, is it now safe to remove the usrmove
repository and re-enable Rawhide? Or should we wait until F17 get
branched and grab the fedora-release RPM that points to the branched
repositories?

Thanks,

- -- 
Michel Alexandre Salim
Fedora Project Contributor: http://fedoraproject.org/

Email:  salimma at fedoraproject.org  | GPG key ID: A36A937A
Jabber: hircus at jabber.ccc.de       | IRC: hircus at irc.freenode.net

()  ascii ribbon campaign - against html e-mail
/\  www.asciiribbon.org   - against proprietary attachments
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/

iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJPLgbfAAoJEEr1VKujapN6US0H/0axnZAJuOWVqiSh4jIjN2vH
GzXMGKSXKcOtTSJKo3ATKEoUetGtq/abQ0sWoujLNSbtYmS9oQ2eeemWzRmhAHYH
pUGoDy8vofZQbHMBMjR3JJNHzrMYmcdZp51h6LvqsqKB/ltSl7qVF+PmfKRzjjSM
PgML51z3GGKlTJZLwkvh03Og6OQedMIcJnJztjnxSxrKw7IgU8PENbAc9Lk5OZNg
WmYyZoyX9UVjajDgoThOXRk7u4UYPhMZZX33Y2FlKLYPIPU4XnMEZAuG7j+ZH3X/
ADkOw66KGPJhOsUHSNpSEA92MIKVTqHC49visapVzeRDg13rJKZC0YnN42tu8iY=
=Oe1R
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----