/usrmove?

[Chris Adams]

Once upon a time, Adam Williamson <awilliam at redhat.com> said:
> At this point we're talking about the (first) feature freeze, not the
> final release. The question is whether there's a violation of the
> feature process if anaconda doesn't have support for usrmove *right
> now*, not whether there's a problem if it doesn't have support by
> release time.

As I quoted, features are supposed to be "substantially complete", and
something that _requires_ anaconda changes should not be considered
anywhere near complete if the required changes haven't been written yet.

This isn't a case of a bug in anaconda not holding up the Alpha release;
it is a feature that is definately not complete and testable after the
feature freeze has passed.

-- 
Chris Adams <cmadams at hiwaay.net>
Systems and Network Administrator - HiWAAY Internet Services
I don't speak for anybody but myself - that's enough trouble.