/usrmove?

[Matthew Garrett]

On Thu, Feb 09, 2012 at 02:14:53AM +0100, Kevin Kofler wrote:

> IMHO, FESCo needs to accept that sometimes they make a mistake (especially 
> if the vote was disputed to begin with) and revote. UsrMove should have been 
> unapproved, not only for F17, but forever.

So, just to be clear, you're saying that even if usrmove had landed in 
an entirely perfect and complete form the day after F16 branched, it 
should still have been rejected?

-- 
Matthew Garrett | mjg59 at srcf.ucam.org