/usrmove?

[drago01]

On Thu, Feb 9, 2012 at 8:57 AM, Tomas Mraz <tmraz at redhat.com> wrote:
> On Thu, 2012-02-09 at 04:24 +0000, Matthew Garrett wrote:
>> On Thu, Feb 09, 2012 at 02:14:53AM +0100, Kevin Kofler wrote:
>>
>> > IMHO, FESCo needs to accept that sometimes they make a mistake (especially
>> > if the vote was disputed to begin with) and revote. UsrMove should have been
>> > unapproved, not only for F17, but forever.
>>
>> So, just to be clear, you're saying that even if usrmove had landed in
>> an entirely perfect and complete form the day after F16 branched, it
>> should still have been rejected?
>
> You're talking about completely theoretical situation nobody is arguing
> on.

Well Keven wrote  "UsrMove should have been unapproved, not only for
F17, but forever." ... so he just oppose the feature per se not its
state.