/usrmove?

[Przemek Klosowski]

On 02/08/2012 07:30 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
>
>
> Am 09.02.2012 01:23, schrieb Adam Williamson:
>> The problem is that life is rarely so neat: you don't get an orderly succession
>> of Big Scary Bugs popping up one at a time for you to shoot down.
>
> there are enough open bugs for the next ten years
>...
> it is a very good idea because the overall quality of fedora would
> be improved if there would be a larger release-blocking to get
> the big changes fixed BEFORE alpha and in the meantime not involved
> maintainers could proceed fixing the tons of small bugs and polish
> the distribution at all - there are really neough rough corners
> involved in the last releases to work on that there is no need
> to proceed this way of releasing and starting alpha/beta with
> known broken things
.
You argue that serial bug fixing approach is more thorough but given 
that in practice we'll never run out of bugs and schedule demands, it 
makes more sense to increase the coverage rather than depth. Rather than 
sniping bugs, we are machine-gunning them, which turns out better in 
practice.