/usrmove? -> about the future

Reindl Harald h.reindl at thelounge.net
Fri Feb 10 15:57:18 UTC 2012



Am 10.02.2012 16:49, schrieb Steve Gordon:
> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: "Reindl Harald" <h.reindl at thelounge.net>
>>> So the likely effect is that these features will be called ready
>>> whenever
>>> they need to be (according to the process) with the rest simply
>>> called
>>> "optimizing".
>>
>> if people do not care the can destroy every process
>> if someone calls repeatly non-ready features as ready
>> he is the wrong person for any sort of decision
>>
>> maybe the project should get rid of some people who
>> do not care or guidelines which have the power to
>> ENFORCE contributors or get rid of them
>>
>> yes this may sound hard
>> but what is the alternative?
>>
>> burn down ressources with each relese more and more
> 
> Where can I review your formal submission(s) for such improvements?

they do not exist because fedoras feature-quality at release
burns down way to much of my time to maintain > 20 machines
with fedora and rebuild half of the distribution to fix
design bugs

so if the releases would be more well thought i would have
time to write such things, but then there would be no need for it

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 262 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/attachments/20120210/c287e137/attachment.sig>


More information about the devel mailing list