/usrmove? -> about the future

[Jon Ciesla]

On Fri, Feb 10, 2012 at 11:42 AM, Jef Spaleta <jspaleta at gmail.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 10, 2012 at 8:36 AM, Dan Williams <dcbw at redhat.com> wrote:
>> In any case, badmouthing systemd for an upgrade bug where it actually
>> works fine *when you're really running F15* doesn't seem right.  I
>> wouldn't have had this problem if it'd installed off the Live CD or done
>> a fresh install.
>
> Shrug, I don't make it a point to do yum based upgrades across release
> boundaries so that would explain why i didn't encounter it.
>
> Did anyone doing and testing the "not supported" upgrade dance to F15
> bother filing it at any point?  Obviously people use it regardless of
> what the support policy is. I would imagine one of them would file it
> as a market for other people who aren't going to follow policy.

I've been yum upgrading since FC1.  I didn't see that.  I was also
running a mysql server.

> I noticed it wasn't list as a common gotcha on the F15 commons bug
> page that is maintained to handle these sorts of quibbles. Do we allow
> for recognition of the "not supported" upgrade dance in the common
> bugs information as a policy or is it the "upgrade path that must not
> be named"?
>
> -jef
> --
> devel mailing list
> devel at lists.fedoraproject.org
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel



-- 
in your fear, seek only peace
in your fear, seek only love

-d. bowie