/usrmove? -> about the future

[Reindl Harald]

Am 10.02.2012 18:49, schrieb Jon Ciesla:
> On Fri, Feb 10, 2012 at 11:42 AM, Jef Spaleta <jspaleta at gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Fri, Feb 10, 2012 at 8:36 AM, Dan Williams <dcbw at redhat.com> wrote:
>>> In any case, badmouthing systemd for an upgrade bug where it actually
>>> works fine *when you're really running F15* doesn't seem right.  I
>>> wouldn't have had this problem if it'd installed off the Live CD or done
>>> a fresh install.
>>
>> Shrug, I don't make it a point to do yum based upgrades across release
>> boundaries so that would explain why i didn't encounter it.
>>
>> Did anyone doing and testing the "not supported" upgrade dance to F15
>> bother filing it at any point?  Obviously people use it regardless of
>> what the support policy is. I would imagine one of them would file it
>> as a market for other people who aren't going to follow policy.
> 
> I've been yum upgrading since FC1.  I didn't see that.  I was also
> running a mysql server.

BOAh mysqld has NOTHING to do with the yum upgrade
mysqld in F15 worked only on baby-systems where nothing
other relies on mysqld but not on machines having tons
of services rely in a init-process who fires them up
after mysqld id reday for connections

how often havce i to repeat this here?


-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 262 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/attachments/20120210/ecb9bba0/attachment.sig>