/usrmove? -> about the future

[Reindl Harald]

Am 10.02.2012 19:45, schrieb Rahul Sundaram:
> On 02/11/2012 12:09 AM, Scott Doty wrote:
>> On 02/10/2012 10:05 AM, Adam Williamson wrote:
>>>
>>> You're not supposed to be running Fedora on production servers. That is
>>> not what it's for.
>>>
>>
>> Sez who?
>>
>> http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/SIGs/Server
> 
> Existence of such a page does not prove anything at all. Anyone can
> create a SIG.  It is just a matter of creating a wiki page.  What
> matters is whether it is active and whether any real work is being done
> on it.  I would suggest you take a closer look at that.   Also every
> distribution has certain traits that make it suitable for certain use
> cases more than others.   I know people who use Fedora on servers but it
> it evident that it is not the primary focus of the distribution.

so what is the reason fedora exists?

Desktop? not really after KDE4.0/GNOME3 in the state it was released
Server? you say no!

so is it really supposed to be a irrelevant playgorund where things
randomly throwed in to see how hard users are in taking problems?

until Redhat gave the control to the community where nobody feels
responsible for anything, nobody can be forced to do anything and
everybody throws in changes wihout feeling responsible for the
consequenses of his acting at all fedora WAS a rock solid distribution

currently it seems to be only a playgorund for people which are
only playing around and never really worked with compouters and
never like to do



-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 262 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/attachments/20120210/0ca6e8f7/attachment.sig>