Rpmbuild unable to recognize used libs?

Andrea Musuruane musuruan at gmail.com
Sat Feb 11 12:52:25 UTC 2012


Hi all,
    a reporter just submitted this bug against tecnoballz:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=789544

After closer inspection, I see that the RPM doesn't require the needed
libraries:

$ rpm -q --requires tecnoballz
/bin/sh
/bin/sh
config(tecnoballz) = 0.92-11.fc16
hicolor-icon-theme
rpmlib(CompressedFileNames) <= 3.0.4-1
rpmlib(FileDigests) <= 4.6.0-1
rpmlib(PayloadFilesHavePrefix) <= 4.0-1
rpmlib(PayloadIsXz) <= 5.2-1

The spec file is available here:
http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/gitweb/?p=tecnoballz.git;a=tree

But if I print the shared libraries needed by the binary I get:

$ ldd /usr/bin/tecnoballz
    linux-vdso.so.1 =>  (0x00007fff7213e000)
    libSDL-1.2.so.0 => /usr/lib64/libSDL-1.2.so.0 (0x0000003b9be00000)
    libpthread.so.0 => /lib64/libpthread.so.0 (0x0000003b88e00000)
    libSDL_image-1.2.so.0 => /usr/lib64/libSDL_image-1.2.so.0
(0x00000033b1a00000)
    libSDL_mixer-1.2.so.0 => /usr/lib64/libSDL_mixer-1.2.so.0
(0x0000003b8b600000)
    libmikmod.so.3 => /usr/lib64/libmikmod.so.3 (0x0000003b89a00000)
    libtinyxml.so.0 => /usr/lib64/libtinyxml.so.0 (0x00007f8cda97a000)
    libstdc++.so.6 => /usr/lib64/libstdc++.so.6 (0x0000003b8de00000)
    libm.so.6 => /lib64/libm.so.6 (0x0000003b89600000)
    libgcc_s.so.1 => /lib64/libgcc_s.so.1 (0x0000003b8a200000)
    libc.so.6 => /lib64/libc.so.6 (0x0000003b88a00000)
    libdl.so.2 => /lib64/libdl.so.2 (0x0000003b89200000)
    /lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2 (0x0000003b88600000)
    libpng12.so.0 => /usr/lib64/libpng12.so.0 (0x00000033b2a00000)
    libjpeg.so.62 => /usr/lib64/libjpeg.so.62 (0x0000003b94a00000)
    libtiff.so.3 => /usr/lib64/libtiff.so.3 (0x00000033b4e00000)
    libz.so.1 => /lib64/libz.so.1 (0x00000033b1200000)

I really don't understand what's wrong here. Any help is appreciated.

Regards,

Andrea.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/attachments/20120211/5e47efa9/attachment.html>


More information about the devel mailing list