/usrmove? -> about the future

[Reindl Harald]

Am 15.02.2012 18:53, schrieb Tomasz Torcz:
> On Wed, Feb 15, 2012 at 11:19:18PM +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
>> On 02/15/2012 10:48 PM, Chris Adams wrote:
>>> Once upon a time, Rahul Sundaram <metherid at gmail.com> said:
>>>> bash-completion is not a default package.
>>>
>>> Wrong since F16 - it is default in the Base group in comps.
>>
>> Ah.  didn't notice that.  I haven't done a fresh installation since
>> Fedora 11 or so.   Regardless of that, the point remains that it is
>> easier to file a bug report when you find a bug rather than assume the
>> developers have noticed the problem already.  I routinely remove
>> bash-completion or disable it in the past because of slowdown in some
>> cases and I suspect I am not the only one.
> 
> And people use different shells (zsh seems to be popular), so they won't
> nottice bugs in something bash-specific.

does not matter because bash is the default shell and
transitions have to be targeted for defaults and any
developer of core-components has to use system defaults
for his testings

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 262 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/attachments/20120215/e241967f/attachment.sig>