devel Digest, Vol 96, Issue 104

Simon Erat erat.simon at gmail.com
Wed Feb 22 09:18:15 UTC 2012


Date: Wed, 22 Feb 2012 00:42:05 +0100
> From: Kevin Kofler <kevin.kofler at chello.at>
> To: devel at lists.fedoraproject.org
> Subject: Re: Package review: SC - Script Collection
> Message-ID: <ji1a4d$s5h$2 at dough.gmane.org>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
>
> Simon Erat wrote:
> > What has been prepared so far:
> > * http://sf.net/p/seasc (source code, in sub projects)
> > * https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=795696  (review request)
> > * http://sea.hostingsociety.com/rpm.sc.template.spec
> > * http://sea.hostingsociety.com/changelog
> > * http://sea.hostingsociety.com/sc-0.2.0.tar.gz (its a bash script,
> > nothing to compile)
> > * http://sea.hostingsociety.com/sc-0.2.0-2.fc16.noarch.rpm
>
> First observations:
> * Name is too short. A package with such a long history as "ed" can get
> away
> with a 2-letter name, but yours not really. It's just asking for conflicts…
> * The specfile name is not valid (should be %{name}.spec, not
> rpm.%{name}.template.spec).
>
>        Kevin Kofler
> --
> devel mailing list
> devel at lists.fedoraproject.org
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
>
> End of devel Digest, Vol 96, Issue 104
> **************************************
>

* IF "sc" really is too short (noone reported that it conflicts any other
name), an obviously alternative would be seasc, which is the projects name
on sourceforge.
* The rpm.sc.template is 'invalid' as that is the file i use as template,
which will get CAT to makerpm's ~/rpmbuild/SPEC/sc.spec, and getting the
changlelog appended.
This procedure can be reviewed in $scDir/system/dev.sc which contains the
self-distributing code.
But since 'sc' is too short (it may, but does not yet) conflict other
things, there has to be another %{name} anyway.

The project is currently located in a folder named "sc-fedora" which could
be an alternative name either.
So either: ssc or scf (which i think already exists and therefore DOES
conflict), or something i dont want the users to type: script-collection.

Anything of this acceptable /negotiateable?

Simon Erat
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/attachments/20120222/227532d0/attachment.html>


More information about the devel mailing list