review of bacula-docs

Matthias Runge mrunge at matthias-runge.de
Wed Jan 11 10:41:08 UTC 2012


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On 11/01/12 11:37, Itamar Reis Peixoto wrote:
> bacula is already in fedora.
> 
> why there are a review  ( with review + ) for bacula-docs ?
> 
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=771941
> 
> why not add bacula-docs as sub-package of bacula ?
> 
> 
This has been discussed earlier on fedora-packaging mailing list.

bacula-docs is rather large and doesn't change often. The plan is, to
make bacula-docs subpackage a real own package.

So, if the maintainer does it right, it won't produce a problem.

- -- 
Matthias Runge <mrunge at matthias-runge.de>
               <mrunge at fedoraproject.org>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/

iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJPDWdEAAoJEOnz8qQwcaIW2zQH+gNFVqjBFqkkDQDU5eK8UcNh
+gfqzOudcizpTF5ApF7kN9fUt0eGzBJtvOTy8f2KjMwhHgZU8E7/6jtN4Qkwxatq
zO9/4kF5XNnr1Y7SXXJF9uaAMVOlD1jk0cpcqHX/kQqC+uTP6aIOspQ33RxnkW8H
bpRsLB4Yr1ksjZQ6L0UcPxChLGLTM0/12UlCrfIBp7IK6+kzwkQI0qahXfj4pbDJ
aa/6GFwczkWAIbVmgsljQMHqZDcvhMLxGQXd1bGVZvKyYpRoyTBg1Kq9kLT2yqaw
a5sNgps+he7WYRWh4wBcNczCKrT90v4+IfOIQfXW0xNkGIruntUNE6gm10vN9DQ=
=DfSf
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


More information about the devel mailing list