Proposal for update to packaging guidelines for icon files
kevin.kofler at chello.at
Wed Jan 11 22:55:52 UTC 2012
Richard Shaw wrote:
> Nowhere did I suggest that the "Short name without extension" example
> should be removed, only that the full pathname example should be
> updated to use /usr/share/icon/hicolor over /usr/share/pixmaps.
The point is that it makes no sense whatsoever to reference /usr/share/icons
with an absolute path! The whole point of /usr/share/icons is to allow
themable icons with potentially multiple sizes, NOT one hardcoded icon.
Using an absolute path does the latter and does defeats the purpose of using
More information about the devel