Packaging guidelines for packaging vala bindings
marcandre.lureau at gmail.com
Tue Jan 17 15:55:10 UTC 2012
On Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 4:22 PM, Richard W.M. Jones <rjones at redhat.com> wrote:
> I agree with Ralf. Vala files are meaningless except for people who
> care about vala, so they should go in a subpackage.
So is gobject-introspection then. Not everybody care about it, or
systemtap, gdb python macros, valgrind..
Furthermore I disagree that the vapi files are meaningless for people
who don't care about vala.
> More to the point, presumably if the vala files were included in
> *-devel, they'd also cause an explicit or implicit dependency on
> vala-devel, which would mean the vala toolchain being pulled in for
> many packages, and that's totally unacceptable.
But we don't care having implict&explicit depedency on a browser or python.
More information about the devel