Packaging guidelines for packaging vala bindings

[Christophe Fergeau]

On Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 04:55:10PM +0100, Marc-André Lureau wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 4:22 PM, Richard W.M. Jones <rjones at redhat.com> wrote:
> > More to the point, presumably if the vala files were included in
> > *-devel, they'd also cause an explicit or implicit dependency on
> > vala-devel, which would mean the vala toolchain being pulled in for
> > many packages, and that's totally unacceptable.
> 
> But we don't care having implict&explicit depedency on a browser or python.

By that reasoning, shouldn't we also fold python bindings in the -devel
package? They are small, python is already implicitly installed, so this
should be fine too.
(NB: I'm just being the devil's advocate here, I'm in favour of separate
subpackages for each language binding)

Christophe
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/attachments/20120117/4893dc42/attachment.sig>