updating goffice to 0.9.0

[Bill Nottingham]

Julian Sikorski (belegdol at gmail.com) said: 
> W dniu 28.11.2011 17:52, Julian Sikorski pisze:
> > W dniu 28.11.2011 17:32, Bill Nottingham pisze:
> >> Julian Sikorski (belegdol at gmail.com) said: 
> >>> Dear Fedorians,
> >>>
> >>> goffice-0.9.0 was released recently, along with new gnumeric [1,2]. What
> >>> is your opinion on pushing the update to rawhide ASAP? To the best of my
> >>> knowledge stable goffice 0.10 and gnumeric 1.12 should be out by the
> >>> time Fedora 17 ships, so putting this into rawhide now would allow for
> >>> plenty of time to iron out any potential problems. Missing the alpha
> >>> change deadline [3] most likely means we need to wait until Fedora 18.
> >>
> >> Is it relatively API stable?
> >>
> >> Bill
> > I asked Jean Brefort, one of goffice developers:
> > 
> > <belegdol> hi jean, I got asked if goffice is relatively api-stable
> > <jean> not yet
> > <jean> but I'd say mostly
> > <belegdol> may i quote you on that?
> > <jean> we intend to add placehoders for more members on exported classes
> > <jean> of course, you can quote me
> > 
> > Regards,
> > Julian
> I am going to go ahead and commit this. In case packages cannot be fixed
> in time, we can always introduce compat-goffice.
> 
> Julian
> -- 
> devel mailing list
> devel at lists.fedoraproject.org
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
>