Requesting a change to the BugStatusWorkFlow: Closed/UPSTREAM
Tim Waugh
twaugh at redhat.com
Fri Jan 20 09:30:19 UTC 2012
On Fri, 2012-01-20 at 08:39 +0100, Marcela Mašláňová wrote:
> I use closed/upstream, when I already fixed it in upstream. This bug
> should be closed with number of release, where it is fixed or with the
> link to the commit. I wouldn't blame this state for not fixing bug in
> some projects. I guess instead of closed/upstream we would see more
> closed/wontfix|cantfix.
I use POST for that.
"A patch or solution believed to resolve this matter has been proposed
(POSTed) for inclusion in the package or kernel."
For non-kernel packages I read that as meaning that the patch is in-hand
upstream, and not yet built in Fedora.
Tim.
*/
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 482 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/attachments/20120120/8c9d771e/attachment.sig>
More information about the devel
mailing list