Requesting a change to the BugStatusWorkFlow: Closed/UPSTREAM

Tim Waugh twaugh at redhat.com
Fri Jan 20 09:30:19 UTC 2012


On Fri, 2012-01-20 at 08:39 +0100, Marcela Mašláňová wrote:
> I use closed/upstream, when I already fixed it in upstream. This bug 
> should be closed with number of release, where it is fixed or with the 
> link to the commit. I wouldn't blame this state for not fixing bug in 
> some projects. I guess instead of closed/upstream we would see more 
> closed/wontfix|cantfix.

I use POST for that.

"A patch or solution believed to resolve this matter has been proposed
(POSTed) for inclusion in the package or kernel."

For non-kernel packages I read that as meaning that the patch is in-hand
upstream, and not yet built in Fedora.

Tim.
*/

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 482 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/attachments/20120120/8c9d771e/attachment.sig>


More information about the devel mailing list