new comps group proposal: Virtualization Host

Daniel P. Berrange berrange at redhat.com
Mon Jan 23 16:18:17 UTC 2012


On Mon, Jan 23, 2012 at 05:09:45PM +0100, Alan Pevec wrote:
> Hi all,
> 
> I'd like to add a new group in comps.xml to make it easier to install
> minimal hypervisor based on Fedora.
> It would include only basic virtualization software (libvirt and
> qemu-kvm) and it would serve as a base to install virtualization
> management stack on top of it.
> Initial use-cases are:
> - Fedora oVirt host where vdsm agent is installed on top of proposed
> Virtualization Host group
>   Also oVirt Node livecd kickstart would use that group instead of the
> current list of packages:
>   http://gerrit.ovirt.org/gitweb?p=ovirt-node.git;a=blob;f=recipe/common-pkgs.ks;hb=HEAD
> 
> - Openstack nova nodes where various openstack-* packages are
> installed, depending on the node configuration (compute, controller,
> images or object store service)
> 
> Since comps groups can't be extended, flow is to choose Minimal on the
> initial Anaconda screen, then Customize Now:
> * http://apevec.fedorapeople.org/virtmin1.png
> In the next step, under Base System category, new "Virtualization
> Host" group is choosen.
> * http://apevec.fedorapeople.org/virtmin2.png
> 
> This should produce a working hypervisor with networking where
> additional packages can be installed using yum.
> 
> Questions for this list are:
> - do you think there's value to have this "Virtualization Host" option
> in the first Anaconda screen, among Graphical Desktop/Software
> Development/Web Server and Minimal, to avoid the second step?
>   This list of options is defined in anaconda and each option maps to
> a list of actual comps groups
> - any better suggestions for the name of the group, maybe
> "Virtualization Minimal", "Minimal Hypervisor", "Virtualization Node"
> ?

You don't mention the eisting 'Virtualization' group there, which
is historically what people have installed when wanting a virtualization
host. Admittedly this does include some desktop tools too.

If introducing a new group for the host, then I'd say we might want
to also change the existing group to be solely the client mgmt tools
"Virtualization Client" ?   It gets even more fuzzy when you wonder
where the new 'GNOME Boxes' app will live - probably under 'GNOME'
desktop I presume ?

Daniel
-- 
|: http://berrange.com      -o-    http://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange/ :|
|: http://libvirt.org              -o-             http://virt-manager.org :|
|: http://autobuild.org       -o-         http://search.cpan.org/~danberr/ :|
|: http://entangle-photo.org       -o-       http://live.gnome.org/gtk-vnc :|


More information about the devel mailing list