The question of rolling release?

[Jon Ciesla]

On Tue, Jan 24, 2012 at 6:24 AM, Richard W.M. Jones <rjones at redhat.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 24, 2012 at 11:23:14AM +0000, mike cloaked wrote:
>> Fedora would appear to be out of line in not taking on board the
>> potential user base for a rolling release version.  For servers there
>> would be huge advantages in management of systems.
>
> I doubt your claims here.
>
> Fedora already has a perfectly good rolling release.  It's called
> Rawhide, and I run it on my laptop.  I'd be nuts to run it on a
> server.

(whistles quietly to self, looks around, goes about business)

> Rich.
>
> --
> Richard Jones, Virtualization Group, Red Hat http://people.redhat.com/~rjones
> virt-p2v converts physical machines to virtual machines.  Boot with a
> live CD or over the network (PXE) and turn machines into Xen guests.
> http://et.redhat.com/~rjones/virt-p2v
> --
> devel mailing list
> devel at lists.fedoraproject.org
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel



-- 
in your fear, seek only peace
in your fear, seek only love

-d. bowie