The question of rolling release?

Johannes Lips johannes.lips at googlemail.com
Tue Jan 24 16:21:45 UTC 2012


YAWN!

On Tue, Jan 24, 2012 at 4:17 PM, Reindl Harald <h.reindl at thelounge.net>wrote:

>
>
> Am 24.01.2012 17:07, schrieb Michal Schmidt:
> >> this is BAD because the version in F15 was a really EARLY state
> >> services for F16 like cups rely on systemd-features that do NOT
> >> exist in F15 - so you have no chance converting sysv to systemd
> >> in an easy way on your F15 installation
> >
> > I disagree with that opinion. One of systemd's features is a pretty
> > good level of SysV compatibility. If there's anything wrong with cups
> > in F15, it should be possible to fix it within F15's feature set.
> > I really don't understand the mania to produce an F15 system without
> > SysV services. You're only bringing the problems upon yourself.
>
> you definition of a clean system is not mine
>
> when i see that services which was not converted to systemd
> needs features which were not available with the systemd
> of F15 this is a clear sign that systemd was NOT ready for
> a GA release
>
> so updates should make it ready for GA
>
> how do you imagine that even maintainers could have
> converted services for the F15 release with a
> non-finished systemd-version?
>
> in my opinion if a core component is changed it must
> not be put in GA before it is ready or if it was too
> early it should been fixed in all points of view instead
> forcing users "take the next dist-upgrade and look what
> components we broke there"
>
>
> --
> devel mailing list
> devel at lists.fedoraproject.org
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/attachments/20120124/0a71ca45/attachment.html>


More information about the devel mailing list