The question of rolling release?
Genes MailLists
lists at sapience.com
Thu Jan 26 03:46:42 UTC 2012
On 01/25/2012 10:01 PM, Josh Boyer wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 25, 2012 at 9:17 PM, Bryan Quigley <gquigs at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> It's pretty simple, really. Basically, if we don't keep the kernel on at
> least a somewhat recent release the amount of work required to support
> that release grows beyond what we can realistically maintain.
>
...
>
> Hopefully that helps explain what we're thinking when we go about doing
> what we do. As usual, sorry for being overly verbose.
>
> josh
A great explanation - and a nice summary of why a rolling release
makes sense for many of the same reasons .. :-)
thanks josh!
PS - special thanks to you and the kernel team for doing a great job
keeping the kernel up to date and purring nicely ...
More information about the devel
mailing list