Unity For Fedora (As in OpenSUSE or Arch)

[Jaroslav Reznik]

What's actually missing (minus the q bindings for g libs under review):
* [1] https://launchpad.net/canonical-multitouch/utouch-geis
* [2] https://launchpad.net/nux depends on [2]

And it seems it now depends on g* Unity Core (not sure now).

So even QML version packaging becomes even more complicated...

R.

----- Original Message -----
> ----- Original Message -----
> > On Fri, 2012-01-27 at 04:16 -0500, Jaroslav Reznik wrote:
> > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > > On Wednesday 25 January 2012 19:05:37 Manuel Escudero wrote:
> > > > > And also I've been told this desktop is available for
> > > > > ArchLinux now as well... As for this facts I was wondering
> > > > > how feasible is to port Unity to Fedora as well
> > > > 
> > > > The last I heard from the Arch packaging efforts was that Unity
> > > > won't
> > > > be an
> > > > officially supported package until it no longer depends on
> > > > non-upstream patches
> > > > to GTK+ and friends.
> > > > 
> > > > The same seems to be true for OpenSuse:
> > > > > Since we're replacing some of the core components of openSUSE
> > > > > (ex:
> > > > > GTK+,
> > > > > gnome-session) the priority is important.
> > > > (pasted from your link)
> > > > 
> > > > I don't think I'm going out on a limb if I say that this
> > > > doesn't
> > > > look
> > > > like
> > > > Unity will hit Fedora repos anytime soon. You may look at
> > > > repos.fedorapeople.org, though.
> > > > 
> > > > As far as I remember Adam Williamson once looked at the
> > > > feasibility
> > > > of
> > > > packaging Unity for Fedora. Don't know what was the result,
> > > > though.
> > > > Maybe he
> > > > can elaborate on that.
> > > 
> > > I tried Unity 2D, the QML version - it's much more easier to
> > > package for
> > > Fedora, I was nearly done but Unity then introduced a lot of new
> > > G*
> > > dependencies and I didn't want to step into our desktop lands
> > > (but
> > > I
> > > suppose the are not using these deps, so it shouldn't be a big
> > > problem).
> > 
> > If it's not in Fedora, you can package it if you need it. You
> > certainly
> > don't need to ask the Desktop team anything (and a bunch of us have
> > proven packager so we can help with updates, if GNOME does end up
> > using
> > those dependencies).
> 
> Yeah, I know, of course. Just heard that time that some Red Hatters/
> Fedora guys ere going to work on it too. Now I'm checking the stuff
> again, refreshing package reviews etc.
> 
> The truth is I gave it up due to completely non-distribution friendly
> approach in Unity upstream (aka no upstream tarballs, just Ubuntu
> packages...).
> 
> Btw. thanks for help offer,
> R.
> 
> > > So I can try to give it another round.
> > > 
> > > R.
> > > 
> > > > Lars
> > > > --
> > > > devel mailing list
> > > > devel at lists.fedoraproject.org
> > > > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
> > 
> > 
> > --
> > devel mailing list
> > devel at lists.fedoraproject.org
> > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
> --
> devel mailing list
> devel at lists.fedoraproject.org
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel